Module · switch on per organisation
Hours that reconcile, not hours that argue
Enclessa Time records two different things and refuses to confuse them: presence, meaning when somebody was at work, and project time, meaning what the work was for. A schedule sets each day’s target and the difference accrues in an overtime ledger rather than evaporating. Periods are submitted, approved and then locked, absence draws on an entitlement ledger, and every timestamp comes from the server rather than from a device clock somebody can change.
Open betaThe platform is being built in the open, so parts of it are not there yet, behaviour changes between releases, and no availability figure is committed while it is in beta. What is still being built.
- Today
- Timesheets
- On projects
- Betrieb Nord4
- Verwaltung1
Today
Friday, 7 August
6:24
Clocked in at 08:04 · target 8:00
This month, day by day
18 days recordedOpen- Fri 7 Aug6:2408:04–12:30, 13:05–Running
- Thu 6 Aug7:4808:12–12:15, 12:50–16:50
- Wed 5 Aug8:3507:55–12:20, 12:55–17:25
At a glance
- Availability
- Module, off by default
- Attendance
- Clock in and out with breaks and corrections
- Project time
- Customers, projects, activities, billable rates
- Approval
- Submit → approve → period lock
- Absence
- Entitlement ledger; sickness recorded, never diagnosed
- Clock source
- Server time only
What does Enclessa Time actually record?
Attendance and project time are separate, and the gap between them is information rather than an error. Somebody can be present for eight hours and book six to projects; that difference is visible instead of being quietly redistributed. Corrections supersede the original entry rather than overwriting it, so the record of what was changed survives.
- Clock in and out, with breaks
- Corrections supersede, never overwrite
- Project time against customers, projects and activities with billable rates
- A daily target from the schedule, with the difference accruing as a balance
How does approval work?
A period is submitted by the person, approved by whoever has that authority, and then locked so it stops moving underneath a payroll run or an invoice. Reopening a locked period is a deliberate act with a record, not a side effect of an edit.
- Submit, approve, lock, with an explicit way back
- Approvals queue for managers
- Reports and asynchronous exports for finance
What does the planning surface show?
Four read models built for four different questions. A week board drawn by the minute for “what did this week look like”. An hours account that drills from year to month to ISO week to day for “where did the balance come from”. A read-only absence planner for “who is away when”. And a personal requests view for “what am I waiting on”.
- Week board, drawn to the minute
- Hours account: year → month → ISO week → day
- Absence planner, read-only
- My requests, in one place
- A channel per project, created through the normal chat permissions
How is absence handled?
Holiday draws down an entitlement ledger, so a balance is the sum of what was granted and taken rather than a number somebody maintains by hand. Sickness is recorded as an absence and nothing more — there is no diagnosis field, because a collaboration platform has no business holding one.
- Entitlement ledger for holiday
- Sickness recorded without any medical detail
- Absence visible to the people who plan around it, not to everyone
What this does not do
- Time is off until an operator enables the module for the organisation.
- There is no shift planning or rota: the planner shows absence and does not schedule staff.
- Carry-over and expiry of entitlement and of overtime, and submission reminders, are designed and not yet built. The daily cap is applied to the balance; weekly limits, breaks, rest periods, night and Sunday work are flagged on the day rather than enforced.
- There is no productivity scoring and no ranking of people by output. That is a deliberate refusal.
- Introducing time recording is the employer’s decision and the employer’s responsibility. Where a works council exists, a system that records working time is generally subject to its co-determination under § 87 (1) no. 6 BetrVG, and a works agreement (Betriebsvereinbarung) may be needed before it goes live. Enclessa is the tool; it does not make that assessment for you.
Related
Where this shows up
Time tracking: common questions
Does Enclessa include time tracking?
Can employees edit their own recorded time?
Does Enclessa Time store sickness reasons?
Does Enclessa do shift planning?
Encrypted collaboration, hosted in Europe.
Create a workspace in a couple of minutes. It is yours at your-team.enclessa.app, hosted in the European Union, with encrypted direct messages from the first one you send.
Open beta. Free plan, no payment card to start.