Skip to content

Why Enclessa

The case for Enclessa, and where it falls apart

Enclessa is in open beta and is chosen for four reasons: direct messages are end-to-end encrypted with MLS per RFC 9420 and no administrator can undo that, the service runs in the European Union under a German seller, one price per member covers messaging, calls and the modules a plan includes — boards, projects, customers, contracts, time tracking, personnel records and the rest, and the architecture is published so a reviewer can check it. Enclessa is the wrong choice where single sign-on, Office editing or a certification is mandatory.

Open betaThe platform is being built in the open, so parts of it are not there yet, behaviour changes between releases, and no availability figure is committed while it is in beta. What is still being built.

The argument in six lines

Release stage
Open beta, open to anybody
The core argument
Confidentiality as a property, not a setting
Encryption
MLS per RFC 9420, direct messages, always on
Hosting
European Union, German seller, EU VAT
Scope
Messaging, calls, boards, time and people in one price
Evidence offered
Published architecture, data model and OpenAPI surface
Leaving
Full organisation export in open formats, at any time

“Everyone says end-to-end encrypted. Why is yours different?”

Because in Enclessa it is a property of the room rather than a setting on the tenant. Direct messages and group direct messages use MLS as specified in RFC 9420, implemented with OpenMLS, with one key per device and no key held by the server — so there is no administrator override, no key escrow and no configuration that quietly turns it off. Where a competitor offers customer-managed keys, the service still processes plaintext; that is a real control and it is a different guarantee. Enclessa is equally clear about the other half: channels are server-managed and readable by the server, because that is what makes search, retention and compliance export possible, and the room says which mode it is in.

How the encryption works

“Why should we trust a new vendor with the conversation?”

You should not, on our word. What replaces the word is published detail: the architecture, the data model and the OpenAPI surface are documented, the confidentiality guarantee rests on an IETF standard and an audited open-source implementation of it, and tenant isolation is proven by a probe suite generated from the API document that drives 286 cross-organisation operations and is refused all 286 times, failing the build if that regresses. The platform control plane our own operators use cannot read content at all, and a continuous-integration check forbids it from importing any code that could.

What protects the data

“Our data cannot leave Europe, and the paperwork has to hold.”

The hosted service runs in one European Union region and the seller is a company established in Germany, so the processing agreement, the invoice and the jurisdiction all point at the same place instead of at a transfer mechanism. Where a mandate goes further than one shared region — a named country, or no shared tenancy at all — the Enterprise plan buys a dedicated deployment in a region you name, with its own database, object storage and media nodes, still operated and updated by us.

Subprocessors, DPA and residency

“We already pay for a suite. Why add another line item?”

Usually you should not, unless confidentiality is a driver — that is the honest answer, and it is why the comparison pages each name the case for the other product. Where it does change the arithmetic is scope: one price per member covers messaging, video calls, task boards with GitHub sync, time tracking with absence, and personnel records, on one permission model and one invitation list. Teams that were paying for a chat product plus a board plus a time tracker are not adding a line item, they are replacing three.

Plans and what each one includes

“How do we know we are not locked in?”

By checking the exit before you need it. An organisation can export everything the platform holds for it, in open formats, at any time and without a support ticket; the data model is documented and the whole API is described by an OpenAPI document, so the export is something you can read and reload rather than a proprietary archive. Nothing about Enclessa gets more expensive to leave the longer you stay, because there is no marketplace, no macro language and no third-party app estate to unpick.

Compare the alternatives, exits included

“Can we see it working before we commit anything?”

Yes, and without a payment card or an expiry date. The Free plan carries up to ten members with channels, threads, end-to-end encrypted direct messages, video calls with screen sharing and ninety days of searchable history, permanently. It is a plan rather than a trial, so an evaluation that stalls for a quarter does not end with a deleted workspace, and moving to a paid plan later keeps everything that is already there.

What the free plan includes

When Enclessa is the wrong choice

This section is the reason to believe the six above it. If any of these describe your organisation, buy something else — and if it is close, the comparison pages say which something else.

Single sign-on is a procurement requirement

Sign-in is by email and password. There is no integration with an external identity provider and no SCIM provisioning, and if your security policy requires either, Enclessa fails the gate today. That is a planned piece of work and planned is not shipped.

A certification is the gate

Enclessa holds no ISO 27001, SOC 2 or comparable certification, and its own implementation has not been through an external security audit. Where a certificate is a precondition rather than a preference, no amount of published architecture substitutes for it.

Your day is Office documents

Enclessa does not edit documents and will not. If the work is co-authored spreadsheets and decks, Microsoft Teams sits inside that in a way nothing else does, and the collaboration tool should follow the documents.

A third-party app or a phone system is load-bearing

No third-party code runs inside Enclessa, by design, and telephony is out of scope: no PSTN, no call queues, no auto attendants. If a vendor’s Slack or Teams app carries one of your processes, or the tool is replacing your phone system, that is decisive.

You need everything encrypted, channels included

End-to-end encryption covers direct messages and group direct messages. Channels are server-readable so that search, retention and compliance export can work. If the requirement is that no group conversation is ever readable by the operator, this product does not meet it.

You must run the software yourself

Enclessa is not distributed. There is no self-hosted licence, no installer and no air-gapped option, and an Enterprise deployment is still infrastructure we operate. Where the requirement is your own machines under your own hands, Mattermost answers it and Enclessa does not.

You need mobile apps today

There are web and macOS clients. There is no iOS or Android application, so a workforce that lives on a phone is not served yet.

Where to go next

Questions

Why Enclessa: common questions

Why choose Enclessa over Slack or Microsoft Teams?

For three reasons that the suites do not offer together: direct messages are end-to-end encrypted with MLS per RFC 9420 so the operator cannot read them, the service runs in the European Union under a German seller, and one price per member covers task boards, time tracking and personnel records as well as the conversation. If Office integration or a third-party app directory is what your work depends on, the suites remain the better buy.

Is Enclessa a good fit for a regulated organisation?

It is a good fit where the requirement is European hosting, a processing agreement with a German seller, retention rules, legal hold, audit logging and a complete export. It is not a fit where the requirement is a certification: Enclessa holds none, and no external audit of its own implementation has been done.

What is the strongest argument against Enclessa?

That it is new. There is no production track record, no customer list and no uptime figure to weigh, and the absent enterprise features — single sign-on, SCIM, mobile applications, certifications — are absent today rather than optional. A buyer with those requirements should choose something else and revisit later.

Does Enclessa lock us in?

A full organisation export in open formats is available at any time, the data model is documented and the API is described by an OpenAPI document, so the exit does not depend on our goodwill. There is also no marketplace or macro language to unpick, which is where most of the real switching cost in this category sits.

Encrypted collaboration, hosted in Europe.

Create a workspace in a couple of minutes. It is yours at your-team.enclessa.app, hosted in the European Union, with encrypted direct messages from the first one you send.

Open beta. Free plan, no payment card to start.