Context is scattered across four tools
The decision is in chat, the task is in a tracker, the change is in a pull request, and reconstructing why something was done means three searches and a guess.
Enclessa connects the three surfaces engineering work actually lives on: channels for the conversation, task boards for the work, and GitHub for the code. Issues become board cards, pull requests attach to the card they close, and check results appear without opening another tab. Everything the interface can do is available over a documented OpenAPI surface with bot accounts and scoped tokens, so the parts of your workflow that should be automated can be.
At a glance
- GitHub
- Two-way issue and pull-request sync
- Boards
- Team-owned, inherit team roles
- API
- Documented OpenAPI, scoped tokens
- Automation
- Bot accounts, webhooks, custom slash commands
- Third-party apps
- Not supported — first-party modules only
The constraints this sector actually has
Every tool brings its own permission model
Onboarding a new engineer means adding them in four places and hoping nobody forgot the fourth.
The backlog is commercially sensitive
What you are building and when is strategy. Handing it to a third-party tracker is a decision that is rarely made deliberately.
ChatOps needs a real API
If automation depends on scraping a UI or an undocumented endpoint, it breaks on the next release.
What Enclessa does about them
Questions
Engineering teams: common questions
Encrypted collaboration, hosted in Europe.
Create a workspace in a couple of minutes. It is yours at your-team.enclessa.app, hosted in the European Union, with encrypted direct messages from the first one you send.
No card required to create a workspace.